Archivado en: medios | escrito por goleech | 05/16/2005 | 13:07

SouthCom Showdown
INVESTIGATORS PROBING interrogation abuses at the U.S. detention center at Guantánamo Bay have confirmed some infractions alleged in internal FBI e-mails that surfaced late last year. Among the previously unreported cases, sources tell NEWSWEEK: interrogators, in an attempt to rattle suspects, flushed a Qur'an down a toilet and led a detainee around with a collar and dog leash. An Army spokesman confirms that 10 Gitmo interrogators have already been disciplined for mistreating prisoners, including one woman who took off her top, rubbed her finger through a detainee's hair and sat on the detainee's lap. (New details of sexual abuse-including an instance in which a female interrogator allegedly wiped her red-stained hand on a detainee's face, telling him it was her menstrual blood-are also in a new book to be published this week by a former Gitmo translator.)
These findings, expected in an upcoming report by the U.S. Southern Command in Miami, could put former Gitmo commander Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller in the hot seat. Two months ago a more senior general, Air Force Lt. Gen. Randall Schmidt, was placed in charge of the SouthCom probe, in part, so Miller could be questioned. The FBI e-mails indicate that FBI agents quarreled repeatedly with military commanders, including Miller and his predecessor, retired Gen. Michael Dunleavy, over the military's more aggressive techniques. "Both agreed the bureau has their way of doing business and DOD has their marching orders from the SecDef," one e-mail stated, referring to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. Sources familiar with the SouthCom probe say investigators didn't find that Miller authorized abusive treatment. But given the complaints that were being raised, sources say, the report will provoke questions about whether Miller should have known what was happening-and acted to try to prevent it. An Army spokesman declined to comment.
-MICHAEL ISIKOFF and JOHN BARRY
Newsweek, 9 de mayo de 2005
Did a report in NEWSWEEK set off a wave of deadly anti-American riots in Afghanistan? That's what numerous news accounts suggested last week as angry Afghans took to the streets to protest reports, linked to us, that U.S. interrogators had desecrated the Qur'an while interrogating Muslim terror suspects. We were as alarmed as anyone to hear of the violence, which left at least 15 Afghans dead and scores injured. But I think it's important for the public to know exactly what we reported, why, and how subsequent events unfolded.
Two weeks ago, in our issue dated May 9, Michael Isikoff and John Barry reported in a brief item in our Periscope section that U.S. military investigators had found evidence that American guards at the detention center in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, had committed infractions in trying to get terror suspects to talk, including in one case flushing a Qur'an down a toilet. Their information came from a knowledgeable U.S. government source, and before deciding whether to publish it we approached two separate Defense Department officials for comment. One declined to give us a response; the other challenged another aspect of the story but did not dispute the Qur'an charge.
Although other major news organizations had aired charges of Qur'an desecration based only on the testimony of detainees, we believed our story was newsworthy because a U.S. official said government investigators turned up this evidence. So we published the item. After several days, newspapers in Pakistan and Afghanistan began running accounts of our story. At that point, as Evan Thomas, Ron Moreau and Sami Yousafzai report this week, the riots started and spread across the country, fanned by extremists and unhappiness over the economy.
Last Friday, a top Pentagon spokesman told us that a review of the probe cited in our story showed that it was never meant to look into charges of Qur'an desecration. The spokesman also said the Pentagon had investigated other desecration charges by detainees and found them "not credible." Our original source later said he couldn't be certain about reading of the alleged Qur'an incident in the report we cited, and said it might have been in other investigative documents or drafts. Top administration officials have promised to continue looking into the charges, and so will we. But we regret that we got any part of our story wrong, and extend our sympathies to victims of the violence and to the U.S. soldiers caught in its midst.
—Mark Whitaker
Newsweek, Editorial del 16 de mayo de 2005
[...] La historia publicada por Newsweek molestó a la Casa Blanca. ¿Cómo un soldado iba a tirar por el retrete una copia del Corán? Pero la historia de Newsweek se queda corta. El Pentágono reconoce que, entre otras cosas, custodios han patead [...]
Referencia de goleech el 06/05 a las 00:46
Lo son. Dieron por cierta información que no estaban en condiciones de probar. Más aún, lo hicieron con una fuente a la que insisten en proteger
Comentario de Rodolfo Soriano el 05/16 a las 13:38
Newsweek es una revista reconocida y, por lo tanto, tiene cierta responsabilidad hacia los lectores por lo que publica y con esto ha perdido credibilidad. Pero estoy de acuerdo contigo en que la responsabilidad por las muertes no es de Newsweek. Aún cuando los disturbios fueran provocados por este artículo, la responsabilidad sigue cayendo sobre los asesinos y quienes incitaron los disturbios.
Comentario de rolva el 05/17 a las 10:37
Nice site!
[url=http://tikpmibd.com/edet/dquq.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://bxowbffc.com/bpcs/llxe.html]Cool site[/url]
Comentario de David el 07/20 a las 00:12
Thank you!
My homepage | Please visit
Comentario de Michelle el 07/20 a las 00:12
Great work!
http://tikpmibd.com/edet/dquq.html | http://lzojwnhw.com/kbqb/gegk.html
Comentario de Quentin el 07/20 a las 00:15
Nice site!
[url=http://nchqqnjy.com/lmcu/ezpb.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://cnvmslsd.com/mtgf/dpri.html]Cool site[/url]
Comentario de Edward el 07/26 a las 07:19
Well done!
My homepage | Please visit
Comentario de Heather el 07/26 a las 07:20
Good design!
http://nchqqnjy.com/lmcu/ezpb.html | http://lyvqftbc.com/twrr/hrsm.html
Comentario de Rhonda el 07/26 a las 07:23
Thank you!
[url=http://obvldutm.com/fgtz/tmjc.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://zdglddkj.com/ajhr/qnwu.html]Cool site[/url]
Comentario de Ingrid el 07/28 a las 18:22
Good design!
My homepage | Please visit
Comentario de Gabriel el 07/28 a las 18:22
Nice site!
http://obvldutm.com/fgtz/tmjc.html | http://mvbuhdso.com/gibz/hwtk.html
Comentario de William el 07/28 a las 18:22
Good design!
[url=http://vunjibwj.com/riyc/tztd.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://ruxtkpee.com/bxah/hmre.html]Cool site[/url]
Comentario de Irene el 09/28 a las 23:36
Thank you!
My homepage | Please visit
Comentario de Nick el 09/28 a las 23:37